The Shapes of Stories
by Kurt Vonnegut
Kurt Vonnegut grained worldwide fame and adoration through the publication of his novels, including Slaughterhouse-Five, Cat's Cradle, Breakfast of Champions, and more.
But is was his rejected master's thesis in anthropology that he called his prettiest contribution to his culture.
The basic idea of his thesis was that a story's main character has ups and downs that can be graphed to reveal the story's shape.
The shape of a society's stories, he said, is the least as interesting as the shape of its pots or spearheads. Let's have a look.
Man in Hole
The main character gets into trouble then gets out of it again and ends up better off for the experience.
Arsenic and Old Lace
Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle
Boy Meets Girl
The main character comes across something wonderful, gets it, loses it, then gets it back forever.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
From Bad to Worse
The main character stats off poorly then gets continually worse with no hope for improvement.
The Twilight Zone
Which Way Is Up?
The story has a lifelike ambiguity that keeps us from knowing if new developments are good or bad.
In many cultures' creation stories, humankind receives incremental gifts from a deity. First major staples like the earth and sky, then smaller things like sparrows and cell phones. Not a common shape for Western stories, however.
Humankind receives incremental gifts from a deity, but is suddenly ousted from good standing in a fall of enormous proportions.
Humankind receives incremental gifts from a deity,is suddenly ousted from good standing but then receives off-the-charts bliss.
Great Expectations with Dickens' alternate ending
It was a similarity between the shapes of Cinderella and the New Testament that thrilled Vonnegut for the first time in 1947 and then over the course of his life as he continued to write essays and give lectures on the shapes of stories.
Embeded for hosted site:
Embeded for wordpress.com: